Categories: Movie Productions , Speed0 Comments
June 10, 2014

Speed is celebrating it’s 20th anniversary today since it was released on June 10, 1994. It’s known as the movie that kicked off Sandy’s career and we thank director Jan De Bont for sticking with her even when the studio pressured him for another female actress. Can you imagine someone else playing Annie? I can’t.

HitFix has a great article with Sandra Bullock, Keanu Reeves and Jan De Bont looking back at Speed 20 years later:

There’s a bomb on a bus. Once the bus goes 50 miles an hour, the bomb is armed. If it drops below 50, it blows up. As movie premises go, this one is absolutely ridiculous, right? You’d have been forgiven for thinking so, at least, as few involved with Jan de Bont’s “Speed,” which was released by 20th Century Fox on June 10, 1994, could have anticipated its popularity. The film was a runaway hit, winning two Oscars and grossing over $350 million worldwide. Now, 20 years later, it’s a celebrated relic of an era before blockbuster filmmaking was so awash in digital wizardry, an era when practical movie magic sold the highest of concepts to the masses.

For actor Keanu Reeves, who starred as the film’s hero, LAPD S.W.A.T. officer Jack Traven, it feels like that long ago if only because so much has changed over the last two decades. Though he had already starred in Kathryn Bigelow’s “Point Break,” it was “Speed” that turned him into an action star Hollywood would test in films like “Johnny Mnemonic,” “Chain Reaction” and “The Matrix” throughout the rest of the ’90s. He looks back on the film today as a fond memory in the unassuming early years of his career.

“I think there’s something that people respond to in the film in the sense that it feels so accessible and human, in a way,” Reeves says. “There’s a vulnerability to it. Having participated in that, and having had a great opportunity, and then to be here 20 years later, it feels like that came from a more innocent time.”

It also came from a time when audiences only knew actress Sandra Bullock, if at all, from work in comedies like “Love Potion No. 9” or futuristic actioner “Demolition Man” opposite Sylvester Stallone. It was “Speed” that sent her career soaring, but, of course, she couldn’t have possibly seen that coming.

“I don’t think anyone had any idea what was going to happen with that film,” the Oscar-winning actress says. “If someone says they did, they’re lying — unless in the editing process they felt something come together. But I certainly didn’t feel it. I think we were sort of ridiculed a bit for being the ‘low budget bomb-on-the-bus movie.’ Not that I cared. I was just so happy to have a job and that I got to work with Keanu. I was grateful no matter what it was.”

Indeed, Bullock wasn’t at all ideal for Fox at the time. The list of more established actresses who were up for the role is long and considerable, from Meryl Streep to Kim Basinger and all points in between. They all turned it down, unmoved by the outlandish concept. But director Jan de Bont fought for Bullock, who had the girl-next-door look and appeal that he felt the role of bus-riding graphic designer (turned bus-driving heroine) Annie needed.

“Initially every studio wants bigger stars for lead roles, and I understand that,” de Bont says. “But I could not see Julia Roberts driving this bus. I could not see several other actresses. I would never believe they would ever even be on a bus. I felt I needed an actress who you could believe would have taken the bus, and Sandra had this kind of every day look – I mean that in a good way — in the way she dresses, the way she behaves, very casual.”

The character of Annie was as important as Jack Traven, de Bont says, because “she had to keep this whole team together and keep the tension going. And responses — secondary reactions are really key in movies like this. How real are they? How believable are they? She did a fantastic job on that. She was exactly what I hoped for, and thank God the studio, at the very last moment, let me choose her.”

The ever-affable Bullock remains indebted to the director, with whom she worked once more on the film’s ill-fated sequel in 1997, for going to the mat for her. “He chose me over so many people that probably would have helped that movie get kicked off in a bigger way,” she says. “He gave me the opportunity. So I’ve got to say, he had some pretty big balls. And I’m grateful for his large balls. And you can quote me on that. And if you can get a visual to go along with that quote, that would be great!”

Filling the bus with reality

De Bont was developing a film about sky-diving at Paramount Pictures when “Speed” first crossed his desk. Even after the studio put it into turnaround, he still maintained an interest in making it his directorial debut because he had a wealth of ideas for how to ground the seemingly fantastical story.

For instance, his desire for a sort of workaday realism didn’t stop with Bullock; it also extended to the characters on bus number 2525. It was important to him that the passengers reflect the multicultural world you encounter on the streets of Los Angeles every day. The studio pushed back, but de Bont was adamant that he have a large number of character actors along for the ride. He was interested not only in realism in his choices, but also the sort of intangible quality that comes with casting less-established actors and the honest reactions they can supply in the heat of an action thriller such as this.

“I really wanted people that happened to connect a little bit,” he says. “You cannot ‘act’ out a lot of those scenes.”

The very reason the film worked at all, Bullock says, is “because of every face and actor you saw on that bus. There was not one false casting note. You genuinely felt that these people would find each other on a bus, and their level of acting and showing the horror — I mean, we’re driving in circles on a bus pretending. They were the ones that I really feel sold the premise and made the movie so good. It could have been so ridiculous, but instead it felt really real and gritty and fresh.”

Nevertheless, Graham Yost’s original screenplay presented more opportunities for a number of those actors, opportunities that they lost as the project was developed further (right up until and during shooting, in fact). Joss Whedon was brought on very late in the game to do a re-write that streamlined the film. In some ways it was by artful necessity; many of the actors will tell you the script needed the tightening. But it was also an economic consideration, as de Bont recalls he wasn’t able to give speaking parts to everyone who was expecting them due to the amount of residuals they would be owed in perpetuity.

“But I wanted to make sure there was a complete balance between the people that had some lines and the people that had no lines, because they’re all the same characters, they all experience the same thing,” de Bont says. “I told them, ‘Listen, even if you think you’re going to just sit on this bus, believe me, you’re not, because I really want you to respond and relate to the events and I’m going to put you right in the middle of it. I’m not just going to try to hide you behind some speaking part. No, you’re going to get a lot of close-ups. I need your reactions. I want the audience to get the same experience, that this is real; these people just happened to wait at the bus stop and get on and suddenly their lives are changed.'”

Whedon’s lament

Yost — a showrunner these days for TV’s “Justified” who sold “Speed” after years toiling away on series like “Full House” and Nickelodeon’s “Hey Dude” — has readily admitted that “98.9 percent of the dialogue” from the film can be attributed to Joss Whedon. But the “Avengers” director, who was a well-regarded script doctor in those days patching up everything from Sam Raimi’s “The Quick and the Dead” to the Kevin Costner bomb “Waterworld,” was arbitrated out of credit for his work. Whedon spoke about his involvement in an interview with NATO’s In Focus magazine in 2005.

“Part of what I did on ‘Speed’ was pare down what they had created, which was kind of artificial,” he told journalist Jim Kozak at the time. “The whole thing about ‘[Jack Traven is] a maverick hotshot,’ I was sort of like, ‘Well, no, what if he’s not? He thinks a little bit laterally for a cop. What if he’s just the polite guy trying not to get anybody killed?'”

Whedon made significant alterations to the plot throughout as well, from killing off Jack’s partner Harry (played by Jeff Daniels) to the disbursement of clues that would lead the LAPD to villainous former cop Howard Payne (Dennis Hopper) to transforming character actor Alan Ruck’s role from that of a smarmy lawyer who gets dispatched to a gee-golly tourist who picked the wrong bus. But Yost — who Whedon has conceded is always very polite to him and is, again, quick to praise his contributions — was lobbied to push for sole credit and got it.

“At that time, and to this day, scripts are fluid,” Reeves says. “I think the director has to put their stamp on it and actors come in. With Jan’s vision, there was a kind of economy to it. There was still a lot of room. But I don’t remember feeling any kind of, like, ‘What’s happening!? Where’s the movie going!?’ while we were doing it.”

De Bont, who utilized Whedon’s talents once again on his 1996 “Speed” follow-up “Twister,” was also looking for, there again, authenticity in the rewrite. He felt the dialogue had to reflect how real people would more or less react in a situation like this, and that’s no easy chore.

“They’re not going to be long discussions on the bus,” de Bont says. “It’s all going to be quick and fast. And there’s nothing worse and nothing more difficult or complicated than to come up with short lines for people in panic. It’s one of the most difficult things you could ever ask a writer to do. We tried to come up with some believable variations and also sometimes let the actors on the bus see what they would do and what they would say, how they would react, because it had to feel real.”

So he needed somebody who could think on his or her feet, someone who, if an actor couldn’t come up with something, could spring into action. “I could call him early in the morning and say, ‘Joss, I need two lines for this,'” de Bont explains. “And then he’d called me back 10 minutes later. He’d come up with some great little sayings that were basically continuing the tension, while at the same time pushing some relief into it as well, because you cannot have two hours of constant similarity in reactions. There are all these people who are turning a little cynical or trying to escape the danger by saying something lighthearted. He was extremely good at that and I really, really, totally have respect. I really tried hard to get him credit.”

Additionally, there was an array of action beats that de Bont conceived, ideas that would come to him that he thought he’d like to see in a movie like this. That includes the iconic 50-foot jump the bus makes over a gap in the freeway, easily one of the key money shots of ’90s action filmmaking.

The arbitration became a sticking point for Whedon. He’s admitted that “Speed” is one of the few movies from that era that he worked on that he actually liked, but beyond one of the rare posters he owns that still bears his name, there’s nothing to reflect his participation in the project.

“I’ve always just disagreed with the WGA’s policy that says you can write every line of dialogue for a movie – and they literally say this – and not deserve credit on it,” Whedon told In Focus in 2005. “Because I think that makes no sense of any kind. Writers get very protective of themselves. They’re worried that some producer will want to add a line so he can put his name on it. But what they can do is throw writers at it forever without putting their names on it because of this rule. So I actually don’t think it works for writers. It certainly didn’t work for me.”

Jack and Annie and freaking out the suits with a new ‘do

When the project was finally off to the races, Reeves really dived into the role of Jack Traven, right down to the costume. He went out and found the jacket Jack wears himself. The pants, everything, he had a vision for it. “I worked with the costume designer to kind of have this beach guy who, by day he’s a kind of easy-going guy, and then when he puts the kit on, it’s ‘go’ time,” the actor recalls. But he also had a certain take on the character’s hair that ultimately made the studio a bit uneasy.

“Once you say, ‘Yes,’ you go for it,” he says. “I think I had longer hair and going into the role you start the physical training, you start working with the S.W.A.T. — we had some great people helping out with that. And for my take on Jack, I wanted to have the influence of the military. It was strong at that time, and still is, on the LAPD S.W.A.T. So I went and got a military haircut and came back with, like, a ‘one’ on the top and a fade on the side and I was a jarhead, LAPD, gum-chewing, badass motherfucker cowboy who wants to save the day and ain’t afraid. Young dumb and you know how the rest goes. I didn’t think it looked that bad, but it freaked some people out. I don’t think they were expecting flowing locks but I don’t think they were expecting to see a complete shave to the side of the head.”

Reeves really liked the character. He sensed something endearing about him beyond the gruff exterior. He felt this was a guy who wanted to save people, who wanted to be the hero, who came alive in a heightened experience. “But he also has a vulnerability,” Reeves says. “He runs out of answers, you know?”

The actor also thinks back fondly to the partnership Jack strikes up with Annie, how they support each other and make it through the day together. And that had to be seeded off-camera if it was going to show up on film at all. “I remember Jan kept having me come back in and audition with the ever-so-beautiful Keanu with some fold-out chairs pretending I was driving,” Bullock recalls. Part of that was due to the director’s need to sell the studio on her virtues, but it also helped lay the groundwork for an eventual camaraderie captured in behind-the-scenes footage of the two actors playing and laughing together on set. (The two would work together again on the romance drama “The Lake House” 12 years later.)

Reeves, however, as countless individuals interviewed for this piece attest, is a much shier, much more private and withdrawn person than his co-star. It took someone with the intangible spark of a Sandra Bullock to draw him out of his shell, a curiosity you can still see play out in the film to this day as Annie flirts with a Jack ambivalent about taking his mind off the emergency at hand.

“His type of acting has always been a little bit awkward,” de Bont confides. “It’s almost like that syndrome where people have trouble expressing themselves emotionally and they don’t want to give that away; they want to keep it to themselves. I thought that was going to be the hardest part. But still, there’s something to it, which is in a way kind of interesting. Keanu is not a regular action hero. He acts a little bit from a meter or three feet away. He kind of sees himself acting and then he looks back from it and then tries to adjust. There’s a double personality on the set and it’s kind of interesting.”

De Bont is also quick to point out that the film, at least beginning with the bus portion, almost takes place in real time. So it’s difficult to go to find extremes in any sort of relationship or love interest angle. “If you meet somebody for the first time, in two hours, how can you actually come to a complete resolved relationship,” he asks rhetorically. “It’s impossible.” It also, funnily enough, gets at the heart of Annie’s warning at the end of the film that relationships that start “under intense experiences” never work out.

For Reeves, the film walked that line very well simply because it never goes too far. “I think the bonding that goes on through high tension and confrontation and duress and crisis is real,” he says. “And I think that they made a nice couple. They were opposites of a kind, but also the same. Because Annie, in the heightened situation, rises to it as well. In terms of the love story, they liked each other and they bonded through the experience. I liked that it wasn’t too far. It was heightened, of course, and there’s some playful dialogue in it, but I think that’s part of the charm of the film, and charm, when it works in movies, is great. You enjoy seeing this couple together.”

A humble little action thriller

If “Speed” were made today it would cost well over $100 million and feature wall-to-wall digital effects. But in 1994, it was a mid-budget ($30 million) actioner full of practical special effects and stunts, the result of honest-to-God grunt work from the various teams involved. It was almost like a documentary, de Bont says, in that he conceived it to put the viewer in the thick of the action, as if you were going on this thrill ride with Jack and Annie and the 17 terrified passengers (plus one wounded bus driver). It was just another extension of his overall desire to make an impact with authenticity, and what looked like such a high-octane blockbuster on the big screen was really a modest production.

“You needed someone who could visually tell this story,” Bullock says. “It was all in the camera movements. It felt very, very small, but his storytelling through the camera is what sold the energy of the film. Had this been locked-off shots, you never would have sold this film, but because of where he instinctively knew to place the camera — and he would grab the camera away from the cinematographer and throw it on his own shoulder and put himself in peril just to get that sense of fear and urgency. I don’t know who else could have done that. It was the perfect vehicle for him to sort of step in and show what he was able to do.”

De Bont used a large number of cameras to capture the visuals from many different angles. There are even shots in the finished film where you can spot a camera in the distance, one of the director’s many eyes focused on the action. He in fact developed a reputation for destroying equipment, like when the first attempt at the freeway jump sequence ended with the bus landing on a row of cameras.

When it came to stunts with the actors, de Bont says he didn’t want there to be anything that he himself couldn’t do. Meaning, his goal of realism even stretched to things like Jack leaping from a car to a moving bus, or hopping onto the side of a subway, things that are heroic, but not necessarily superhuman. In fact, when all of the passengers transfer from the bus to the large rescue vehicle toward the end of the film? That was the real actors (who received extra pay as a result of one of them, the late Paula Montes, holding firm that stunt work should yield more reimbursement).

“I think that created a big change with the actors and they started getting very, very excited about it,” de Bont says. “And then at one point they of course wanted to do everything!”

Leave a Reply


Current Projects
Untitled Tupperware Movie
Sandra Bullock as Brownie Wise
The story of how marketing executive Brownie Wise boosted the sales of the plastic containers invented by Earl Silas Tupper in the 1950s by setting up "Tupperware Paties".
Release: Unknown
Status: In development
Genre: Comedy, Drama, Biography
  • More Info | Photos | IMDb

  • Bird Box
    Sandra Bullock as Malorie
    A woman and a pair of children are blindfolded and make their way through a dystopian setting along a river.
    Release: December 21, 2018
    Genre: Drama, Horror
  • More Info | Photos | IMDb

  • Ocean's Eight
    Sandra Bullock as Debbie Ocean
    Spin-off of the Ocean's Trilogy, directed by Gary Ross.
    Release: 2018
    Status: Released
    Genre: Comedy, Drama
  • More Info | Photos | IMDb

  • Affiliates

    Site Information
    Owner: Susu
    Contact: Email
    Since: May 23, 2009
    Born as: on January 1st, 2008
    Current Online:
    Sandra Bullock Web is a non-profit fansite that has no affiliation to the actress and her respective projects. I don't have any kind of contact with Sandra Bullock, her family, agents, friends, etc. Everything here has the copyright of it's respective owners. No copyright infrigment is intent.